Official ballot record · Published research

Alma S. Adams

Democratic candidate for US HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT 12.

Support with reservations

72.06/100

The candidate clears the office-appropriate alignment, confidence, validation, and publication gates.

Review official voting information

Alma S. Adams's public campaign material contains 6 validated positive alignment signals under the approved methodology.

Evidence published

Research status

Evidence confidence
86%
Score coverage
100%
Recommendation
Support with reservations
Last reviewed
2026-07-25
Finance · complete

Campaign finance

OpenFEC reports $370,506.43 in receipts, $487,322.17 in disbursements, and $456,593.63 cash on hand through 2026-06-30.

Open finance source ↗

Funding composition

Where the money comes from

Individual contributions$94,894.06 · 25.6%
Party committees$3,000 · 0.8%
Other political committees$271,275 · 73.2%
Other receipts$1,337.37 · 0.4%

Material funding concerns

watch concern

ACTBLUE · $27,360

This is material institutional funding; its sponsor, purpose, and relationship to the candidate warrant scrutiny.

watch concern

LENDINGTREE LLC POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · $10,000

This is material institutional funding; its sponsor, purpose, and relationship to the candidate warrant scrutiny.

watch concern

INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SHEET METAL, AIR, RAIL AND TRANSPORTATION WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION LEAGUE · $10,000

This is material institutional funding; its sponsor, purpose, and relationship to the candidate warrant scrutiny.

watch concern

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF TEACHERS, AFL-CIO COMMITTEE ON POLITICAL EDUCATION · $10,000

This is material institutional funding; its sponsor, purpose, and relationship to the candidate warrant scrutiny.

watch concern

INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE · $10,000

This is material institutional funding; its sponsor, purpose, and relationship to the candidate warrant scrutiny.

View the complete official filing ↗

Personal donations are not attributed to a donor's employer. Independent expenditures are reported separately from money received by the campaign.

Evidence-gated scorecard

How this candidate measures up

80/100

Worker-policy alignment

Positive evidence: Supports single-payer healthcare, Medicaid expansion, and affordable preventive care. Supports collective bargaining, worker safety, paid leave, and a higher minimum wage. Supports SNAP, affordable housing, childcare, public education, and HBCUs. Applied under the approved worker and material-security rules.

Evidence confidence: 88%
not applicable

Record reliability

No comparable governing record exists; this does not reduce the candidate's score.

Evidence confidence: 0%
35/100

Funding independence

Official filings show party and other political-committee receipts equal to approximately 74.0% of the displayed funding breakdown. This does not infer donor motive.

Evidence confidence: 90%
80/100

Democracy and ethics

Positive evidence: Supports abortion rights, privacy, equal pay, and Black maternal-health investment. Supports LGBTQ equality and broader civil-rights protections. Supports background checks, closing gun-sale loopholes, and assault-weapons restrictions. Applied under the approved civil-rights and democratic-safety rules.

Evidence confidence: 90%
88/100

Transparency

The reviewed profile publishes 6 source-linked evidence items and labels candidate statements separately from official records.

Evidence confidence: 85%
Record versus promises

not applicable

Promises: Published candidate commitments are shown as statements.

Record: No comparable governing record is available.

The absence of a governing record is labeled as a risk and is not scored as a failure.

Candidate questionnaire

0/10 answered

Questionnaire participation is not treated as positive or negative evidence during the launch period.

Request or submit answers →

Viability · separate from merit

Developing campaign

Reported receipts exceed $100,000. Organization and competitiveness still require separate evidence.

Risks and uncertainty

What remains uncertain

No governing record

No comparable legislative, executive, or judicial record is available. Campaign commitments are not treated as accomplishments.

Evidence record

What the sources establish

Validated position

Values alignment

Supports abortion rights, privacy, equal pay, and Black maternal-health investment.

Supports abortion rights, privacy, equal pay, and Black maternal-health investment.

Candidate campaign materialVerified 2026-07-25

Validated position

Values alignment

Supports single-payer healthcare, Medicaid expansion, and affordable preventive care.

Supports single-payer healthcare, Medicaid expansion, and affordable preventive care.

Candidate campaign materialVerified 2026-07-25

Validated position

Values alignment

Supports collective bargaining, worker safety, paid leave, and a higher minimum wage.

Supports collective bargaining, worker safety, paid leave, and a higher minimum wage.

Candidate campaign materialVerified 2026-07-25

Validated position

Values alignment

Supports LGBTQ equality and broader civil-rights protections.

Supports LGBTQ equality and broader civil-rights protections.

Candidate campaign materialVerified 2026-07-25

Validated position

Values alignment

Supports background checks, closing gun-sale loopholes, and assault-weapons restrictions.

Supports background checks, closing gun-sale loopholes, and assault-weapons restrictions.

Candidate campaign materialVerified 2026-07-25

Validated position

Values alignment

Supports SNAP, affordable housing, childcare, public education, and HBCUs.

Supports SNAP, affordable housing, childcare, public education, and HBCUs.

Candidate campaign materialVerified 2026-07-25

Report an error or submit evidence