Research status
- Evidence confidence
- 86%
- Score coverage
- 81%
- Recommendation
- Support with reservations
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-25
Official ballot record · Published research
Anna Ferguson
Republican candidate for NC HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT 119.
Anna Ferguson's public campaign material contains 3 validated positive alignment signals under the approved methodology.
Campaign finance
NCSBE reports $8,000 in election-cycle receipts, $18 in expenditures, and $7,982 cash on hand through 06/30/2026.
Open finance source ↗Campaign links
Funding composition
Where the money comes from
Named individual contributions$1,200 · 15.0%
Loans and other receipts$6,800 · 85.0%
No named source in the processed filing crossed the project's material-concern threshold.
View the complete official filing ↗
Personal donations are not attributed to a donor's employer. Independent expenditures are reported separately from money received by the campaign.
Evidence-gated scorecard
How this candidate measures up
Worker-policy alignment
Positive evidence: Supports Medicaid funding and rural medical services. Supports greater public-school funding beginning with teacher pay. Opposes withholding public services as legislative leverage. Applied under the approved worker and material-security rules.
Evidence confidence: 88%Record reliability
No comparable governing record exists; this does not reduce the candidate's score.
Evidence confidence: 0%Funding independence
Official filings show party and other political-committee receipts equal to approximately 0.0% of the displayed funding breakdown. This does not infer donor motive.
Evidence confidence: 90%Democracy and ethics
No sufficiently specific, validated democracy or judicial-rights position is published.
Evidence confidence: 0%Transparency
The reviewed profile publishes 4 source-linked evidence items and labels candidate statements separately from official records.
Evidence confidence: 85%not applicable
Promises: Published candidate commitments are shown as statements.
Record: No comparable governing record is available.
The absence of a governing record is labeled as a risk and is not scored as a failure.
0/10 answered
Questionnaire participation is not treated as positive or negative evidence during the launch period.
Small campaign scale
Reported receipts remain below $100,000, indicating fewer financial resources than major statewide campaigns. This is not a prediction of defeat and does not alter political merit.
Risks and uncertainty
What remains uncertain
Covered rights vagueness
Reproductive, LGBTQ, immigration, gun, and church-state positions remain unpublished.
No governing record
No comparable legislative, executive, or judicial record is available. Campaign commitments are not treated as accomplishments.
Evidence record
What the sources establish
Validated position
Values alignment
Supports Medicaid funding and rural medical services.
“Supports Medicaid funding and rural medical services.”
Validated position
Values alignment
Supports greater public-school funding beginning with teacher pay.
“Supports greater public-school funding beginning with teacher pay.”
Validated position
Values alignment
Opposes withholding public services as legislative leverage.
“Opposes withholding public services as legislative leverage.”
Requires further review
Coverage warning
Reproductive, LGBTQ, immigration, gun, and church-state positions remain unpublished.
“Reproductive, LGBTQ, immigration, gun, and church-state positions remain unpublished.”