Research status
- Evidence confidence
- 74%
- Score coverage
- 25%
- Recommendation
- No endorsement
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-25
Official ballot record · Published research
Ben Moss
Republican candidate for NC HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT 052.
Ben Moss's verified campaign material contains source-linked policy statements. Covered-rights gaps remain explicitly unscored.
Campaign finance
NCSBE reports $49,643 in election-cycle receipts, $45,155.71 in expenditures, and $27,331.18 cash on hand through 06/30/2026.
Open finance source ↗Campaign links
Funding composition
Where the money comes from
Named individual contributions$23,610 · 47.6%
Unitemized individual contributions$407 · 0.8%
Other political committees$25,626 · 51.6%
Material funding concerns
North Carolina Automobile Dealers Association PAC · $1,026
This is material institutional funding; its sponsor, purpose, and relationship to the candidate warrant scrutiny.
NC HOME BUILDERS ASSN PAC · $1,000
This is material institutional funding; its sponsor, purpose, and relationship to the candidate warrant scrutiny.
View the complete official filing ↗
Personal donations are not attributed to a donor's employer. Independent expenditures are reported separately from money received by the campaign.
Evidence-gated scorecard
How this candidate measures up
Worker-policy alignment
No sufficiently specific, validated worker-policy position is published.
Evidence confidence: 0%Record reliability
No comparable governing record exists; this does not reduce the candidate's score.
Evidence confidence: 0%Funding independence
Official filings show party and other political-committee receipts equal to approximately 51.6% of the displayed funding breakdown. This does not infer donor motive.
Evidence confidence: 90%Democracy and ethics
No sufficiently specific, validated democracy or judicial-rights position is published.
Evidence confidence: 0%Transparency
The reviewed profile publishes 0 source-linked evidence items and labels candidate statements separately from official records.
Evidence confidence: 74%not applicable
Promises: Published candidate commitments are shown as statements.
Record: No comparable governing record is available.
The absence of a governing record is labeled as a risk and is not scored as a failure.
0/10 answered
Questionnaire participation is not treated as positive or negative evidence during the launch period.
Small campaign scale
Reported receipts remain below $100,000, indicating fewer financial resources than major statewide campaigns. This is not a prediction of defeat and does not alter political merit.
Risks and uncertainty
What remains uncertain
No governing record
No comparable legislative, executive, or judicial record is available. Campaign commitments are not treated as accomplishments.
Evidence record