Research status
- Evidence confidence
- 86%
- Score coverage
- 100%
- Recommendation
- Not recommended
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-25
Official ballot record · Published research
David Willis
Republican candidate for NC HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT 068.
David Willis's public campaign material contains 2 validated values-conflict signals and 0 positive alignment signals under the approved methodology.
Campaign finance
NCSBE reports $76,611.82 in election-cycle receipts, $41,735.6 in expenditures, and $60,980.28 cash on hand through 06/30/2026.
Open finance source ↗Campaign links
Funding composition
Where the money comes from
Named individual contributions$64,559.58 · 84.3%
Unitemized individual contributions$125 · 0.2%
Party committees$250 · 0.3%
Other political committees$11,677.24 · 15.2%
Loans and other receipts$0 · 0.0%
No named source in the processed filing crossed the project's material-concern threshold.
View the complete official filing ↗
Personal donations are not attributed to a donor's employer. Independent expenditures are reported separately from money received by the campaign.
Evidence-gated scorecard
How this candidate measures up
Worker-policy alignment
Conflict evidence: Supports school choice that includes nonpublic alternatives, creating public-resource diversion and accountability concerns. Applied under the approved worker and material-security rules.
Evidence confidence: 88%Record reliability
No comparable governing record exists; this does not reduce the candidate's score.
Evidence confidence: 0%Funding independence
Official filings show party and other political-committee receipts equal to approximately 15.6% of the displayed funding breakdown. This does not infer donor motive.
Evidence confidence: 90%Democracy and ethics
Conflict evidence: Highlights passage of the Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act; operative effects require continuing review. Applied under the approved civil-rights and democratic-safety rules.
Evidence confidence: 90%Transparency
The reviewed profile publishes 3 source-linked evidence items and labels candidate statements separately from official records.
Evidence confidence: 85%not applicable
Promises: Published candidate commitments are shown as statements.
Record: No comparable governing record is available.
The absence of a governing record is labeled as a risk and is not scored as a failure.
0/10 answered
Questionnaire participation is not treated as positive or negative evidence during the launch period.
Small campaign scale
Reported receipts remain below $100,000, indicating fewer financial resources than major statewide campaigns. This is not a prediction of defeat and does not alter political merit.
Risks and uncertainty
What remains uncertain
High-risk: School vouchers
Supports school choice that includes nonpublic alternatives, creating public-resource diversion and accountability concerns.
Material: Punitive immigration
Highlights passage of the Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act; operative effects require continuing review.
Church state scrutiny
Highlights church and Fellowship of Christian Athletes leadership; church-state positions require review.
No governing record
No comparable legislative, executive, or judicial record is available. Campaign commitments are not treated as accomplishments.
Evidence record
What the sources establish
high conflict
Values conflict
Supports school choice that includes nonpublic alternatives, creating public-resource diversion and accountability concerns.
“Supports school choice that includes nonpublic alternatives, creating public-resource diversion and accountability concerns.”
material conflict
Values conflict
Highlights passage of the Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act; operative effects require continuing review.
“Highlights passage of the Criminal Illegal Alien Enforcement Act; operative effects require continuing review.”
Requires further review
Coverage warning
Highlights church and Fellowship of Christian Athletes leadership; church-state positions require review.
“Highlights church and Fellowship of Christian Athletes leadership; church-state positions require review.”