Research status
- Evidence confidence
- 86%
- Score coverage
- 100%
- Recommendation
- Support with reservations
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-25
Official ballot record · Published research
Elma Hairston
Democratic candidate for NC HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT 059.
Elma Hairston's public campaign material contains 4 validated positive alignment signals under the approved methodology.
Campaign finance
NCSBE reports $10,710.26 in election-cycle receipts, $6,692.07 in expenditures, and $4,018.19 cash on hand through 06/30/2025.
Open finance source ↗Campaign links
Funding composition
Where the money comes from
Named individual contributions$10,610.26 · 99.1%
Loans and other receipts$100 · 0.9%
No named source in the processed filing crossed the project's material-concern threshold.
View the complete official filing ↗
Personal donations are not attributed to a donor's employer. Independent expenditures are reported separately from money received by the campaign.
Evidence-gated scorecard
How this candidate measures up
Worker-policy alignment
Positive evidence: Supports affordable, accessible healthcare guided by evidence-based medicine. Supports public schools, apprenticeships, and skilled-trades preparation. Emphasizes workforce development and publishes labor support. Applied under the approved worker and material-security rules.
Evidence confidence: 88%Record reliability
No comparable governing record exists; this does not reduce the candidate's score.
Evidence confidence: 0%Funding independence
Official filings show party and other political-committee receipts equal to approximately 0.0% of the displayed funding breakdown. This does not infer donor motive.
Evidence confidence: 90%Democracy and ethics
Positive evidence: Identifies voting rights and justice as priorities. Applied under the approved civil-rights and democratic-safety rules.
Evidence confidence: 90%Transparency
The reviewed profile publishes 4 source-linked evidence items and labels candidate statements separately from official records.
Evidence confidence: 85%not applicable
Promises: Published candidate commitments are shown as statements.
Record: No comparable governing record is available.
The absence of a governing record is labeled as a risk and is not scored as a failure.
0/10 answered
Questionnaire participation is not treated as positive or negative evidence during the launch period.
Small campaign scale
Reported receipts remain below $100,000, indicating fewer financial resources than major statewide campaigns. This is not a prediction of defeat and does not alter political merit.
Risks and uncertainty
What remains uncertain
No governing record
No comparable legislative, executive, or judicial record is available. Campaign commitments are not treated as accomplishments.
Evidence record
What the sources establish
Validated position
Values alignment
Supports affordable, accessible healthcare guided by evidence-based medicine.
“Supports affordable, accessible healthcare guided by evidence-based medicine.”
Validated position
Values alignment
Supports public schools, apprenticeships, and skilled-trades preparation.
“Supports public schools, apprenticeships, and skilled-trades preparation.”
Validated position
Values alignment
Emphasizes workforce development and publishes labor support.
“Emphasizes workforce development and publishes labor support.”
Validated position
Values alignment
Identifies voting rights and justice as priorities.
“Identifies voting rights and justice as priorities.”