Research status
- Evidence confidence
- 86%
- Score coverage
- 44%
- Recommendation
- Not recommended
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-25
Official ballot record · Published research
Jonathan Almond
Republican candidate for NC HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT 073.
Jonathan Almond's public campaign material contains 6 validated values-conflict signals and 0 positive alignment signals under the approved methodology.
Campaign finance
NCSBE reports $48,265.04 in election-cycle receipts, $49,070.66 in expenditures, and $18,747.84 cash on hand through 06/30/2026.
Open finance source ↗Campaign links
Funding composition
Where the money comes from
Named individual contributions$17,135.04 · 35.5%
Unitemized individual contributions$330 · 0.7%
Party committees$19,000 · 39.4%
Other political committees$11,800 · 24.4%
Material funding concerns
NC HOUSE REPUBLICAN CAMPAIGN COMMITTEE · $19,000
This source supplies at least 10% of reported receipts, creating high donor concentration.
NC ASSOCIATION OF NURSE ANESTHETISTS · $1,000
This is material institutional funding; its sponsor, purpose, and relationship to the candidate warrant scrutiny.
View the complete official filing ↗
Personal donations are not attributed to a donor's employer. Independent expenditures are reported separately from money received by the campaign.
Evidence-gated scorecard
How this candidate measures up
Worker-policy alignment
No sufficiently specific, validated worker-policy position is published.
Evidence confidence: 0%Record reliability
No comparable governing record exists; this does not reduce the candidate's score.
Evidence confidence: 0%Funding independence
Official filings show party and other political-committee receipts equal to approximately 63.8% of the displayed funding breakdown. This does not infer donor motive.
Evidence confidence: 90%Democracy and ethics
Conflict evidence: Supports additional restrictions on abortion. Opposes any attempt to restrict Second Amendment rights. Supports building a wall and removing everyone who entered the country unlawfully. Supports limited early voting and rare absentee voting. Supports categorical restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare for minors. Opposes critical race theory and social-emotional-learning curricula. Applied under the approved civil-rights and democratic-safety rules.
Evidence confidence: 90%Transparency
The reviewed profile publishes 6 source-linked evidence items and labels candidate statements separately from official records.
Evidence confidence: 85%not applicable
Promises: Published candidate commitments are shown as statements.
Record: No comparable governing record is available.
The absence of a governing record is labeled as a risk and is not scored as a failure.
0/10 answered
Questionnaire participation is not treated as positive or negative evidence during the launch period.
Small campaign scale
Reported receipts remain below $100,000, indicating fewer financial resources than major statewide campaigns. This is not a prediction of defeat and does not alter political merit.
Risks and uncertainty
What remains uncertain
High-risk: Abortion restriction
Supports additional restrictions on abortion.
High-risk: Gun absolutism
Opposes any attempt to restrict Second Amendment rights.
High-risk: Mass removal
Supports building a wall and removing everyone who entered the country unlawfully.
High-risk: Voting restriction
Supports limited early voting and rare absentee voting.
High-risk: Anti trans policy
Supports categorical restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare for minors.
Material: Curriculum censorship
Opposes critical race theory and social-emotional-learning curricula.
No governing record
No comparable legislative, executive, or judicial record is available. Campaign commitments are not treated as accomplishments.
Evidence record
What the sources establish
high conflict
Values conflict
Supports additional restrictions on abortion.
“Supports additional restrictions on abortion.”
high conflict
Values conflict
Opposes any attempt to restrict Second Amendment rights.
“Opposes any attempt to restrict Second Amendment rights.”
high conflict
Values conflict
Supports building a wall and removing everyone who entered the country unlawfully.
“Supports building a wall and removing everyone who entered the country unlawfully.”
high conflict
Values conflict
Supports limited early voting and rare absentee voting.
“Supports limited early voting and rare absentee voting.”
high conflict
Values conflict
Supports categorical restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare for minors.
“Supports categorical restrictions on gender-affirming healthcare for minors.”
material conflict
Values conflict
Opposes critical race theory and social-emotional-learning curricula.
“Opposes critical race theory and social-emotional-learning curricula.”