Research status
- Evidence confidence
- 74%
- Score coverage
- 25%
- Recommendation
- No endorsement
- Last reviewed
- 2026-07-25
Official ballot record · Published research
Rodney Sadler
Democratic candidate for NC HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES DISTRICT 106.
Rodney Sadler's verified campaign material contains source-linked policy statements. Covered-rights gaps remain explicitly unscored.
Campaign finance
NCSBE reports $274,536.9 in election-cycle receipts, $244,813.33 in expenditures, and $29,723.57 cash on hand through 06/30/2026.
Open finance source ↗Campaign links
Funding composition
Where the money comes from
Named individual contributions$237,590.1 · 86.5%
Unitemized individual contributions$12,130.27 · 4.4%
Party committees$7,800 · 2.8%
Other political committees$17,016.53 · 6.2%
Loans and other receipts$0 · 0.0%
No named source in the processed filing crossed the project's material-concern threshold.
View the complete official filing ↗
Personal donations are not attributed to a donor's employer. Independent expenditures are reported separately from money received by the campaign.
Evidence-gated scorecard
How this candidate measures up
Worker-policy alignment
No sufficiently specific, validated worker-policy position is published.
Evidence confidence: 0%Record reliability
No comparable governing record exists; this does not reduce the candidate's score.
Evidence confidence: 0%Funding independence
Official filings show party and other political-committee receipts equal to approximately 9.0% of the displayed funding breakdown. This does not infer donor motive.
Evidence confidence: 90%Democracy and ethics
No sufficiently specific, validated democracy or judicial-rights position is published.
Evidence confidence: 0%Transparency
The reviewed profile publishes 2 source-linked evidence items and labels candidate statements separately from official records.
Evidence confidence: 74%not applicable
Promises: Published candidate commitments are shown as statements.
Record: No comparable governing record is available.
The absence of a governing record is labeled as a risk and is not scored as a failure.
0/10 answered
Questionnaire participation is not treated as positive or negative evidence during the launch period.
Developing campaign
Reported receipts exceed $100,000. Organization and competitiveness still require separate evidence.
Risks and uncertainty
What remains uncertain
No governing record
No comparable legislative, executive, or judicial record is available. Campaign commitments are not treated as accomplishments.
Evidence record
What the sources establish
Candidate campaign statement
Worker power
I know that it is possible to have strong public schools where all of our kids can thrive. We must fully fund our public schools up to the levels required by our state constitution and the Leandro ruling. We must put an end to voucher schemes that divert money from our schools. We must raise pay and enact collective bargaining rights to recruit and retain the very best educators in our schools.
“I know that it is possible to have strong public schools where all of our kids can thrive. We must fully fund our public schools up to the levels required by our state constitution and the Leandro ruling. We must put an end to voucher schemes that divert money from our schools. We must raise pay and enact collective bargaining rights to recruit and retain the very best educators in our schools.”
Candidate campaign statement
Wages and economic security
We must urgently raise the minimum wage to a living wage so that working families can afford to live. We must also repeal so-called “right-to-work” laws, a leftover of Jim Crow that keeps working people from organizing to stand up to corporate interests.
“We must urgently raise the minimum wage to a living wage so that working families can afford to live. We must also repeal so-called “right-to-work” laws, a leftover of Jim Crow that keeps working people from organizing to stand up to corporate interests.”