Official ballot record · Research in progress

Tanya White Anderson

Democratic candidate for NC STATE SENATE DISTRICT 12.

Research in progress

No score published

Ballot and finance records are available, but worker-policy and governing-record research is not yet complete.

Ask for a completed questionnaire

No recommendation issued

Evidence review

Research has not been completed. Missing evidence is not treated as opposition.

Pending review

Record and promises

Statements, commitments, sponsorships, and votes will remain separate when reviewed evidence is available.

Finance · complete

Campaign finance

NCSBE reports $15,943.19 in election-cycle receipts, $5,924.61 in expenditures, and $10,000 cash on hand through 06/30/2026.

Open finance source ↗

Funding composition

Where the money comes from

Named individual contributions$2,472.22 · 15.5%
Unitemized individual contributions$175 · 1.1%
Party committees$1,500 · 9.4%
Other political committees$2,163 · 13.6%
Loans and other receipts$9,632.97 · 60.4%

Material funding concerns

watch concern

PAUL BARRINGER FOR CONGRESS · $1,830

This is material institutional funding; its sponsor, purpose, and relationship to the candidate warrant scrutiny.

View the complete official filing ↗

Personal donations are not attributed to a donor's employer. Independent expenditures are reported separately from money received by the campaign.

Evidence-gated scorecard

How this candidate measures up

insufficient evidence

Worker-policy alignment

Not scored until sufficient independently validated evidence is published.

Evidence confidence: 0%
insufficient evidence

Record reliability

Not scored until sufficient independently validated evidence is published.

Evidence confidence: 0%
insufficient evidence

Funding independence

Not scored until sufficient independently validated evidence is published.

Evidence confidence: 0%
insufficient evidence

Democracy and ethics

Not scored until sufficient independently validated evidence is published.

Evidence confidence: 0%
insufficient evidence

Transparency

Not scored until sufficient independently validated evidence is published.

Evidence confidence: 0%
Record versus promises

insufficient evidence

Promises: No validated campaign commitments are published.

Record: No complete, office-appropriate governing-record comparison is published.

No conclusion is drawn until promises and official actions can be compared.

Candidate questionnaire

0/10 answered

The project launched today and questionnaire participation is not currently treated as positive or negative evidence.

Request or submit answers →

Viability · separate from merit

Small campaign scale

Reported receipts remain below $100,000, indicating fewer financial resources than major statewide campaigns. This is not a prediction of defeat and does not alter political merit.

Report an error or submit evidence